Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03202
Original file (BC 2011 03202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-03202
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In separate applications, dated, 20 August 2011, 4 January 
2013 and 2 March 2013, the applicant request that:

1.  He be awarded any medals, ribbons, awards, decorations and 
citations for his service in the Air Force and verification of 
foreign service.

2.  He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and 
verify medals, ribbons, decorations and citations.

3.  He be awarded any campaign medal or ribbon for his service 
in Pakistan.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Air Force verified his boots on the ground during the Indian 
and Pakistan war of 1965.  He believes he qualifies for 
decorations for his service.  He further states he works with 
Veterans and has been asked to join his local Veterans of 
Foreign Wars (VFW); however, his DD Form 214 does not allow him 
membership with the VFW.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides documents 
extracted from his military personnel records and other 
documentation.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 June 1962.





On 19 April 1966, the applicant was honorably released from 
active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.  He served 
3 years and 10 months on active duty and was credited with 
3 years, 1 month and 10 days of foreign and/or sea service.

On 15 November 2011, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that they 
verified boots on ground at Darmstadt, Germany from 7 March 1963 
to 15 January 1965 for 1 year, 10 months and 9 days; Peshawar, 
Pakistan – from 27 March 1965 to 8 April 1966 for 1 year and 13 
days.

On 15 December 2011, AFPC/DPSOY advised the applicant that his 
foreign service should reflect 5 years, 4 months and 12 days.  
His record was amended to reflect the correction.  DPSOY further 
stated the applicant can use his DD Form 214 and a copy of the 
letters from DPAPP dated 15 November 2011 and DPSIDR dated 
29 November 2011 to validate being overseas.  The case was 
administratively closed since the relief requested in the 2011 
application was resolved administratively.

The case was reopened based on his submission of another 
application on 4 January 2013.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID verified foreign service in Darmstadt, Germany, from 
7 March 1963 to 15 January 1965 and Peshawar, Pakistan from 
27 March 1965 to 8 April 1966.

They were unable to locate a campaign or service medal 
authorized for service in Pakistan from 27 March 1965 to 8 April 
1966, or Germany from 7 March 1963 to 15 January 1965.

After a thorough review of the applicant’s master personnel 
record, they were able to determine award of the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the National Defense Service 
Medal (NDSM).  Administrative correction of the applicant’s 
record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states a review of the 
applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted 
fail to provide any documents that substantiate foreign service 
time in Vietnam.

The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states his unit – the 6937th is excluded from 
membership at the VFW.  The VFW requires that his DD Form 
214 show eminent danger pay or that he provide correspondence 
reflecting he served in a hazardous or hostile area while 
receiving eminent danger pay.  The eminent danger pay, bombings 
or hostile fire while serving boots on the ground is not 
annotated on his DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of 
proof of the existence of an error or injustice.  Therefore, 
other than the administrative corrections cited above, we find 
no basis to recommend granting any additional relief sought in 
this application.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03202 in Executive Session on 3 December 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Forms 149, dated 20 August 2011, 4 January
	            2013 and 2 March 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Record.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 March 2013.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 April 2013.
  Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 April 2013.
  Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 23 April 2013, w/atchs.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01290

    Original file (BC-2012-01290.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. AFPC/DPSID will also administratively correct the applicant’s record to reflect the following medals and/or ribbons: 1. In regard to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04560

    Original file (BC 2012 04560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). In a letter to the applicant dated 14 February 2013, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that they verified and confirmed he had boots on the ground Foreign Service time at Tay Ninh Army Airfield, Republic of Vietnam from 30 May 1968 to 30 May 1969, for one year and one day. Regarding his request to correct his records to reflect Foreign Service in Japan, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05692

    Original file (BC 2012 05692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s master personnel records do not contain information that reflects his service in the Dominican Republic. While we note the applicant provided a copy of temporary duty orders reflecting an itinerary to the Dominican Republic, these orders alone are not sufficient to substantiate that he traveled to the Dominican Republic as he contends. However, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05692

    Original file (BC 2012 05692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s master personnel records do not contain information that reflects his service in the Dominican Republic. While we note the applicant provided a copy of temporary duty orders reflecting an itinerary to the Dominican Republic, these orders alone are not sufficient to substantiate that he traveled to the Dominican Republic as he contends. However, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04672

    Original file (BC-2012-04672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends that the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Foreign Service time. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02562

    Original file (BC 2013 02562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02562 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02514

    Original file (BC-2012-02514.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his records and he be issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and any other awards related to service in Vietnam. Based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03692

    Original file (BC-2011-03692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...